When financial reporting enters the public sphere, two sets of standards rise to the surface—PCAOB and US GAAP. It is true that they may seem interchangeable at first glance. However, it should be recognized that they serve very different functions. This distinction is fundamental for acknowledging how a PCAOB audit is different from a normal audit.
US GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) simply refers to the standards for preparing financial statements. PCAOB standards, on the other hand, define how those financial statements are audited. Naturally, they work in parallel. Yet, not in place of one another.
In other words, the financial statements created under GAAP are what the auditors evaluate using PCAOB audit standards. These are not competing frameworks—they are complementary.
These entities should prepare financials under GAAP and have them examined under PCAOB audit standards. In contrast, private companies may follow GAAP. Yet, they are typically audited under GAAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards) issued by the AICPA.
This makes PCAOB vs GAAS a more appropriate comparison when discussing audit frameworks. GAAP governs reporting for both private and public entities, while PCAOB governs auditing for public-facing ones.
The distinction also lies in the intent:
It should be recognized that GAAP is not concerned with how well the audit is conducted, and PCAOB is not concerned with whether an asset is recorded using the right depreciation method. Each holds its own lane.
In the context of how a PCAOB audit is different from a normal audit, the distinction between PCAOB vs US GAAP enables clearer communication between preparers, auditors, and regulators, as well as investors. GAAP sets the language of the financials. PCAOB makes sure that the translation is honest, complete, and tested.
For professional assistance in PCAOB audits, Dimov Audit presents more than 14 years of expertise.